Hi, Does anyone know how long it usually takes to complete the installation process of Vista build 5308 on Virtual PC? It seems to be taking forever and was wondering if there are any tips to troubleshooting on whether it is stuck.
Thanks, -Matt

Vista 5308 Build Install Times
Matt Tinney wrote:
Hi, Does anyone know how long it usually takes to complete the installation process of Vista build 5308 on Virtual PC? It seems to be taking forever and was wondering if there are any tips to troubleshooting on whether it is stuck.
For me it took about 5 hours. I have heard reports from others that it has taken 2 and 3 times that long. Install is extreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeemly sloooooooooooooooooooooow under Virtual PC. Once installed, performance will suffer until you install the Virtual Machine Additions from Virtual Server 2005 R2. In fact, you will find the experience is better if you use Virtual Server rather than Virtual PC (http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/virtualserver/software/default.mspx). -- Tom Porterfield
It really depends on the amount of RAM you assign to it (512 and up, the more, the better), I recommend you use VM Ware or Virtual Server 2005 for the best results. -- -- Andre Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
"Matt Tinney" wrote in message
Hi, Does anyone know how long it usually takes to complete the installation process of Vista build 5308 on Virtual PC? It seems to be taking forever and was wondering if there are any tips to troubleshooting on whether it is stuck.
Thanks, -Matt
I agree...right now VMWare is way better for performance...i get install times in comperable times as physical and faster when using a mounted iso.
-- Josh
"Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" wrote in message
It really depends on the amount of RAM you assign to it (512 and up, the more, the better), I recommend you use VM Ware or Virtual Server 2005 for the best results. -- -- Andre Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
"Matt Tinney" wrote in message Hi, Does anyone know how long it usually takes to complete the installation process of Vista build 5308 on Virtual PC? It seems to be taking forever and was wondering if there are any tips to troubleshooting on whether it is stuck.
Thanks, -Matt
I'd definately recommend upgrading to Beta 2 - it's much better performance as a whole :o)
-- Zack Whittaker » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared that up!
--: Original message follows :-- "Josh" wrote in message
I agree...right now VMWare is way better for performance...i get install times in comperable times as physical and faster when using a mounted iso.
-- Josh
"Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" wrote in message It really depends on the amount of RAM you assign to it (512 and up, the more, the better), I recommend you use VM Ware or Virtual Server 2005 for the best results. -- -- Andre Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
"Matt Tinney" wrote in message Hi, Does anyone know how long it usually takes to complete the installation process of Vista build 5308 on Virtual PC? It seems to be taking forever and was wondering if there are any tips to troubleshooting on whether it is stuck.
Thanks, -Matt
And its not like he is restricted from getting it. -- -- Andre Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
"Zack Whittaker" wrote in message
I'd definately recommend upgrading to Beta 2 - it's much better performance as a whole :o)
-- Zack Whittaker » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared that up!
--: Original message follows :-- "Josh" wrote in message I agree...right now VMWare is way better for performance...i get install times in comperable times as physical and faster when using a mounted iso.
-- Josh
"Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" wrote in message It really depends on the amount of RAM you assign to it (512 and up, the more, the better), I recommend you use VM Ware or Virtual Server 2005 for the best results. -- -- Andre Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
"Matt Tinney" wrote in message Hi, Does anyone know how long it usually takes to complete the installation process of Vista build 5308 on Virtual PC? It seems to be taking forever and was wondering if there are any tips to troubleshooting on whether it is stuck.
Thanks, -Matt
Couldn't tell if that was sarcastic or not... but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. I'm presuming if he's got 5308, he's likely to have an MSDN subscription. If so - he can download Beta 2 now :o)
-- Zack Whittaker » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared that up!
--: Original message follows :-- "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" wrote in message
And its not like he is restricted from getting it. -- -- Andre Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
"Zack Whittaker" wrote in message I'd definately recommend upgrading to Beta 2 - it's much better performance as a whole :o)
-- Zack Whittaker » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared that up!
--: Original message follows :-- "Josh" wrote in message I agree...right now VMWare is way better for performance...i get install times in comperable times as physical and faster when using a mounted iso.
-- Josh
"Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" wrote in message It really depends on the amount of RAM you assign to it (512 and up, the more, the better), I recommend you use VM Ware or Virtual Server 2005 for the best results. -- -- Andre Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
"Matt Tinney" wrote in message Hi, Does anyone know how long it usually takes to complete the installation process of Vista build 5308 on Virtual PC? It seems to be taking forever and was wondering if there are any tips to troubleshooting on whether it is stuck.
Thanks, -Matt
Correct, thats what I meant, or he is a Technical Tester or TAP member. -- -- Andre Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
"Zack Whittaker" wrote in message
Couldn't tell if that was sarcastic or not... but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. I'm presuming if he's got 5308, he's likely to have an MSDN subscription. If so - he can download Beta 2 now :o)
-- Zack Whittaker » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared that up!
--: Original message follows :-- "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" wrote in message And its not like he is restricted from getting it. -- -- Andre Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
"Zack Whittaker" wrote in message I'd definately recommend upgrading to Beta 2 - it's much better performance as a whole :o)
-- Zack Whittaker » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared that up!
--: Original message follows :-- "Josh" wrote in message I agree...right now VMWare is way better for performance...i get install times in comperable times as physical and faster when using a mounted iso.
-- Josh
"Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" wrote in message It really depends on the amount of RAM you assign to it (512 and up, the more, the better), I recommend you use VM Ware or Virtual Server 2005 for the best results. -- -- Andre Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
"Matt Tinney" wrote in message Hi, Does anyone know how long it usually takes to complete the installation process of Vista build 5308 on Virtual PC? It seems to be taking forever and was wondering if there are any tips to troubleshooting on whether it is stuck.
Thanks, -Matt
Or he got it from usenet.
"Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" wrote in message
Correct, thats what I meant, or he is a Technical Tester or TAP member. -- -- Andre Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
"Zack Whittaker" wrote in message Couldn't tell if that was sarcastic or not... but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. I'm presuming if he's got 5308, he's likely to have an MSDN subscription. If so - he can download Beta 2 now :o)
-- Zack Whittaker » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared that up!
--: Original message follows :-- "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" wrote in message And its not like he is restricted from getting it. -- -- Andre Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
"Zack Whittaker" wrote in message I'd definately recommend upgrading to Beta 2 - it's much better performance as a whole :o)
-- Zack Whittaker » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared that up!
--: Original message follows :-- "Josh" wrote in message I agree...right now VMWare is way better for performance...i get install times in comperable times as physical and faster when using a mounted iso.
-- Josh
"Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" wrote in message It really depends on the amount of RAM you assign to it (512 and up, the more, the better), I recommend you use VM Ware or Virtual Server 2005 for the best results. -- -- Andre Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
"Matt Tinney" wrote in message Hi, Does anyone know how long it usually takes to complete the installation process of Vista build 5308 on Virtual PC? It seems to be taking forever and was wondering if there are any tips to troubleshooting on whether it is stuck.
Thanks, -Matt
In any case, use the vm additions from VSR2 and not the VPC additions. Perf will be much better.
"Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" wrote in message
It really depends on the amount of RAM you assign to it (512 and up, the more, the better), I recommend you use VM Ware or Virtual Server 2005 for the best results. -- -- Andre Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
"Matt Tinney" wrote in message Hi, Does anyone know how long it usually takes to complete the installation process of Vista build 5308 on Virtual PC? It seems to be taking forever and was wondering if there are any tips to troubleshooting on whether it is stuck.
Thanks, -Matt
Thanks for the tip Colin. :) -- -- Andre Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
"Colin Barnhorst" wrote in message
In any case, use the vm additions from VSR2 and not the VPC additions. Perf will be much better.
"Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" wrote in message It really depends on the amount of RAM you assign to it (512 and up, the more, the better), I recommend you use VM Ware or Virtual Server 2005 for the best results. -- -- Andre Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
"Matt Tinney" wrote in message Hi, Does anyone know how long it usually takes to complete the installation process of Vista build 5308 on Virtual PC? It seems to be taking forever and was wondering if there are any tips to troubleshooting on whether it is stuck.
Thanks, -Matt
With 1 gb. of ram for VPC, it took me 2 hours, Processor was 2,53 ghz.
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 11:46:04 -0700, "Matt Tinney" wrote:
Hi, Does anyone know how long it usually takes to complete the installation process of Vista build 5308 on Virtual PC? It seems to be taking forever and was wondering if there are any tips to troubleshooting on whether it is stuck.
Thanks, -Matt
Windows Vista
User login
Related topics
- Vista and the Bell-Padula Model
- internet
- URGENT - BLACK SCREEN
- M/S Streets and Trips 2004
- Vista Clean Install
- sil3114
- Any Comments about SATA drives in Beta 2?
- Drivers for Soundblaster Audigy 2?
- Can't get Trainz2006 running (odd Error mesages)
- BUG?: Outlook 2003 context menu in start bar
- Windows Mobile Device Centre
- triple boot
- Why more than one driver for each video card in 5472?
- Vista under Virtual Server 2005 R2 CPU at 100%
- realtek audio from asus p5ld2 motherboard - driver doesn't w
- WGA Optional Tiny Print? Kick it to da curb
- fast.exe application error on startup
- Money 2006 Crashes in Vista
- SideBar Launcher
- The new Vista ISO download
- RegCleaner v1
- storport.sys problem
- Fasttrak 378 compatible driver, anyone?
- Razer Diamondback not working all the time in Vista Beta 2
- windowsupdate
- ISO issues`
- Error: not a valid win32 application
- Media Center - Performance Horrendous
- my beta 2 experience
- Mouse - Vista
- Nero Burning Rom